
Tìm hiểu cách EximGPT giúp doanh nghiệp nghiên cứu thuế quan, phân tích tác động thương mại và tinh giản việc tuân thủ để hoạch định thương mại...

Last updated: April 21, 2026 · Written by the EximAgent Trade Intelligence Team · Reviewed by EximAgent’s customs compliance desk
US–China trade policy in April 2026 is defined by five facts:
The next pivot point is the Trump–Xi summit scheduled for May 14–15, 2026 in China, the first visit by a sitting US president in eight years.
EximAgent is a B2B trade intelligence platform serving export–import professionals across Vietnam, India, Malaysia, and the United States. This analysis is produced by our trade intelligence team, which tracks HS-level tariff changes and export control updates daily. The underlying reporting in this article draws on Reuters’ April 21, 2026 investigation by Michael Martina, Trevor Hunnicutt, and David Brunnstrom, combined with US government trade data and expert commentary from CSIS, Brookings, and AEI.
Tariff rates vary by HS code. The 145% peak from early 2025 was rolled back after Beijing’s rare earth counter-pressure and a February 2026 Supreme Court ruling that invalidated many duties. Exporters should check line-item HS codes and current tariff rates rather than rely on headline figures..
Yes. According to US government data, the goods trade deficit with China fell approximately 32% to $202 billion in 2025, down from 2024 levels. However, US manufacturing lost 91,000 jobs during most of the same period, suggesting the tariffs did not translate into the reshoring the administration wanted.
“Managed trade” is the term USTR Jamieson Greer used publicly in March 2026 to describe the revised US approach: stable bilateral relations, more balanced trade, and commerce concentrated in non-sensitive goods. It is a narrower goal than the original ambition of pressuring China into structural economic concessions.
The Trump–Xi summit is scheduled for May 14–15, 2026, in China. It would be the first visit by a sitting US president to China in eight years.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer have led day-to-day China policy, rather than Secretary of State Marco Rubio, despite Rubio’s more hawkish positions on China.
Trump returned to office and imposed tariffs reaching approximately 145% on Chinese goods. The stated goal was to force concessions on trade imbalance, intellectual property, and industrial subsidies.
China retaliated with its own tariff hikes. The sharper move was its threat to restrict exports of rare earth elements — the refining of which China dominates globally — putting acute pressure on US defense, EV, and semiconductor supply chains.
Trump announced approval of Nvidia H200 AI chip sales to China on social media. The US Department of Justice had publicly described the same chips as smuggled national security threats approximately 30 minutes earlier. Two US officials told Reuters the contradiction left government staff “flummoxed.”
The Pentagon published a blacklist of top Chinese technology companies accused of aiding the People’s Liberation Army, then withdrew it within approximately one hour with no public explanation.
The Supreme Court invalidated many of the administration’s duties. According to Scott Kennedy of CSIS, the original tariff-leverage strategy “quickly ran aground” and “there has been no coherent Plan B.”
USTR Greer publicly reframed the policy goal: stable relations, balanced trade, and commerce in non-sensitive goods.
The summit in China will be the first visit by a sitting US president in eight years.
Metric | Value | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
Peak tariff rate on Chinese goods | ~145% | Early 2025 | US government |
US goods trade deficit with China | $202 billion | 2025 | US government data |
Change in trade deficit | −32% | 2024 → 2025 | US government data |
US manufacturing jobs lost | 91,000 | Feb–Dec 2025 | BLS via Reuters |
Weapons sales approved to Taiwan | $11 billion | December 2025 | US government |
What the data shows, in one sentence: The tariffs achieved the narrow goal of shrinking the bilateral deficit but did not deliver the broader goals of reshoring manufacturing or changing China’s mercantilist trade posture.
What happened: Trump approved the sale in December 2025, minutes after the DOJ called the same chips a national security threat. Why it matters: It signaled that semiconductor export controls are now transactional, not categorical.
What happened: Top Chinese tech firms were blacklisted in February 2026 and removed within an hour. Why it matters: Compliance teams cannot rely on entity lists as stable. Screening must be done at transaction time.
What happened: Commerce rules extending controls to thousands of Chinese subsidiaries were issued in fall 2025, then paused. Planned port fees on Chinese-built vessels were also paused after Beijing’s rare earth threat. Why it matters: China’s rare earth leverage works. Any future escalation is likely to trigger similar pauses.
Vietnam, Malaysia, and Mexico have all faced transshipment-related scrutiny. Documentation of substantial transformation and rules of origin compliance is more important than it has been in a decade.
Three realistic outcomes:
Jonathan Czin of the Brookings Institution framed the broader situation as the US “taking pawns off the periphery rather than controlling the center of the board” — tactical wins in Panama, Taiwan arms, and Iran operations without altering the structural competition with China. The summit is likely to reflect that same pattern.
Managed trade, where governments negotiate and adjust tariff levels, quotas, and sectoral carve-outs bilaterally rather than letting broad free-trade rules govern them. In the 2026 US–China context, it refers to USTR Greer’s stated goal of stable, balanced trade in non-sensitive goods.
Rare earth elements — A group of 17 metallic elements critical for magnets, EV motors, wind turbines, semiconductors, and defense systems. China dominates global refining and processing capacity.
Rules of origin — The criteria used to determine the national source of a product for tariff and trade-agreement purposes. Relevant for transshipment scrutiny.
This article is editorial analysis for trade professionals. It is not legal, tax, or customs advice. Consult a licensed customs broker or trade attorney for transaction-specific guidance.

Tìm hiểu cách EximGPT giúp doanh nghiệp nghiên cứu thuế quan, phân tích tác động thương mại và tinh giản việc tuân thủ để hoạch định thương mại...

Explore India’s shift from protectionism to global capitalism. Analyze the EFTA deal, export challenges, the roadmap to becoming an FTA powerhouse.
We use cookies
We use cookies to improve your experience, analyse traffic, and deliver personalised content and ads. Essential cookies for security and core functionality are always enabled. By clicking "Accept", you consent to our use of additional cookies.
For more information, see our privacy policy.